Comments on: Nine Marks of Gospel Preaching – Durham Style http://jamesdurham.wordpress.com/2008/04/28/nine-marks-of-gospel-preaching-durham-style/ Exploring the views of James Durham on the Free Offer of the Gospel Sat, 05 Dec 2009 10:39:04 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: Donald John MacLean http://jamesdurham.wordpress.com/2008/04/28/nine-marks-of-gospel-preaching-durham-style/#comment-832 Donald John MacLean Wed, 28 May 2008 19:41:27 +0000 http://jamesdurham.wordpress.com/?p=67#comment-832 Dear G.M Yes, preachers who are committed to proclaiming the sovereignty of God coupled with the full, free and earnest offer of the gospel are the need of the hour. Our duty is to beseech the Lord of the harvest to send such labourers into his harvest field. Every blessing DJM Dear G.M

Yes, preachers who are committed to proclaiming the sovereignty of God coupled with the full, free and earnest offer of the gospel are the need of the hour. Our duty is to beseech the Lord of the harvest to send such labourers into his harvest field.

Every blessing
DJM

]]> By: puritanismtoday http://jamesdurham.wordpress.com/2008/04/28/nine-marks-of-gospel-preaching-durham-style/#comment-824 puritanismtoday Mon, 26 May 2008 22:53:29 +0000 http://jamesdurham.wordpress.com/?p=67#comment-824 Dear D.J.M, There is indeed a crying need for a recovery of such Biblical preaching today. G.M Dear D.J.M,

There is indeed a crying need for a recovery of such Biblical preaching today.

G.M

]]> By: Steven Carr http://jamesdurham.wordpress.com/2008/04/28/nine-marks-of-gospel-preaching-durham-style/#comment-788 Steven Carr Wed, 30 Apr 2008 01:37:35 +0000 http://jamesdurham.wordpress.com/?p=67#comment-788 Thanks, the covenant is truly one of the greatest of all God's blessings. My dad has four grandchildren now and he has baptized all four of them. Thanks, the covenant is truly one of the greatest of all God’s blessings. My dad has four grandchildren now and he has baptized all four of them.

]]> By: Donald John MacLean http://jamesdurham.wordpress.com/2008/04/28/nine-marks-of-gospel-preaching-durham-style/#comment-787 Donald John MacLean Mon, 28 Apr 2008 20:22:38 +0000 http://jamesdurham.wordpress.com/?p=67#comment-787 Hi Steve Yes, agreed on authority. The tenth mark was that there was flexibility in the free offer i.e. it was more present in some sermons than others. This is the case in Durham also but I didn't think it was overly relevant, although true and important. I also wanted to do a take on "9 marks ministries" in the title. My wife asked the same question when she read the post. I liked the baptism pictures by the way. God's covenant with believers and their children is indeed precious. My wife's father baptised our little girl nearly three years ago now and DV will be performing the same duty later on this summer when our second is born. Hi Steve

Yes, agreed on authority. The tenth mark was that there was flexibility in the free offer i.e. it was more present in some sermons than others. This is the case in Durham also but I didn’t think it was overly relevant, although true and important. I also wanted to do a take on “9 marks ministries” in the title. My wife asked the same question when she read the post.

I liked the baptism pictures by the way. God’s covenant with believers and their children is indeed precious. My wife’s father baptised our little girl nearly three years ago now and DV will be performing the same duty later on this summer when our second is born.

]]> By: Steven Carr http://jamesdurham.wordpress.com/2008/04/28/nine-marks-of-gospel-preaching-durham-style/#comment-784 Steven Carr Mon, 28 Apr 2008 16:49:26 +0000 http://jamesdurham.wordpress.com/?p=67#comment-784 Amen to that! I would add to that list a great sense of the authority of Christ. You're leaving out the tenth mark has made me curious, what was the tenth mark and why did it not seem applicable here? Amen to that! I would add to that list a great sense of the authority of Christ. You’re leaving out the tenth mark has made me curious, what was the tenth mark and why did it not seem applicable here?

]]>