Is the Westminster Confession “scholastic”?

To follow in the footsteps of the Reformed orthodox, “we distinguish”! Here is Richard Muller on the issue of “scholasticism” and the Westminster Confession:

… the Westminster Confession, although produced in an era of scholastic doctrine, does not itself follow the method. As the theologians of the day would have noted, a confession is not “scholastic”; rather, it is positive or declarative and belongs to a genre parallel to that of a catechism … it is doubtless true that the architectonic vision and patters of definition found in the Westminster Assembly’s confession and catechisms reflect the concerns for clarity, precise definition , and logically presented argument characteristic of a mind trained in scholastic forms, but the documents themselves are not strictly “scholastic”.
Richard Muller, After Calvin, 27

2 Responses to “Is the Westminster Confession “scholastic”?”

  1. westportexperiment Says:

    I also often observe how the Confession is saturated with Scripture phraseology. If that’s the case, and the Confession is supposedly ‘scholastic,’ then I suppose the Scriptures are scholastic.

  2. Donald John MacLean Says:

    Yes, it is very rich in Scripture. The problem with accusations of “scholasticism” is that so often the term is left undefined (or defined wrongly) – which is why Muller is so helpful!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: